By BEN SISARIO, ALEXANDRA
ALTER and SEWELL CHANOCT.
CULTURE By NATALIA V.
OSIPOVA and JON PARELES
Half a century ago, Bob
Dylan shocked the music world by plugging in an electric guitar and alienating
folk purists. For decades he continued to confound expectations, selling
millions of records with dense, enigmatic songwriting.
Now, Mr. Dylan, the poet
laureate of the rock era, has been rewarded with the Nobel Prize in Literature,
an honor that elevates him into the company of T. S. Eliot, Gabriel García
Márquez, Toni Morrison and Samuel Beckett.
Mr. Dylan, 75, is the first
musician to win the award, and his selection on Thursday is perhaps the most
radical choice in a history stretching back to 1901. In choosing a popular
musician for the literary world’s highest honor, the Swedish Academy, which
awards the prize, dramatically redefined the boundaries of literature, setting
off a debate about whether song lyrics have the same artistic value as poetry
or novels.
Some prominent writers
celebrated Mr. Dylan’s literary achievements, including Stephen King, Joyce
Carol Oates and Salman Rushdie, who called Mr. Dylan “the brilliant inheritor
of the bardic tradition,” adding, “Great choice.”
But others called the
academy’s decision misguided and questioned whether songwriting, however
brilliant, rises to the level of literature.
“Bob Dylan winning a Nobel
in Literature is like Mrs Fields being awarded 3 Michelin stars,” the novelist
Rabih Alameddine wrote on Twitter. “This is almost as silly as Winston
Churchill.”
Jodi Picoult, a
best-selling novelist, snarkily asked, “I’m happy for Bob Dylan,
#ButDoesThisMeanICanWinAGrammy?”
But some commentators
bristled. Two youth-oriented websites, Pitchfork and Vice, both ran columns
questioning whether Mr. Dylan was an appropriate choice for the Nobel.
As the writer of classic
folk and protest songs like “Blowin’ in the Wind” and “The Times They Are
a-Changin’,” as well as Top 10 hits including “Like a Rolling Stone,” Mr. Dylan
is an unusual Nobel winner. The first American to win the prize since Ms.
Morrison in 1993, he is studied by Oxford dons and beloved by presidents.
Yet instead of appearing at
the standard staid news conference arranged by a publisher, Mr. Dylan was in
Las Vegas on Thursday for a performance at a theater there. By late afternoon,
Mr. Dylan had not commented on the honor.
Mr. Dylan has often
sprinkled literary allusions into his music and cited the influence of poetry
on his lyrics, and has referenced Arthur Rimbaud, Paul Verlaine and Ezra Pound.
He has also published poetry and prose, including his 1971 collection,
“Tarantula,” and “Chronicles: Volume One,” a memoir published in 2004. His
collected lyrics from 1961-2012 are due out on Nov. 1 from Simon &
Schuster.
Literary scholars have long
debated whether Mr. Dylan’s lyrics can stand on their own as poetry, and an
astonishing volume of academic work has been devoted to parsing his music. The
Oxford Book of American Poetry included his song “Desolation Row,” in its 2006
edition, and Cambridge University Press released “The Cambridge Companion to
Bob Dylan” in 2009, further cementing his reputation as a brilliant literary
stylist.
Billy Collins, the former
United States poet laureate, argued that Mr. Dylan deserved to be recognized
not merely as a songwriter, but as a poet.
“Most song lyrics don’t
really hold up without the music, and they aren’t supposed to,” Mr. Collins
said in an interview. “Bob Dylan is in the 2 percent club of songwriters whose
lyrics are interesting on the page even without the harmonica and the guitar
and his very distinctive voice. I think he does qualify as poetry.”
In giving the literature
prize to Mr. Dylan, the academy may also be recognizing that the gap has closed
between high art and more commercial creative forms.
“It’s literature, but it’s
music, it’s performance, it’s art, it’s also highly commercial,” said David
Hajdu, a music critic for The Nation who has written extensively about Mr.
Dylan and his contemporaries. “The old categories of high and low art, they’ve
been collapsing for a long time, but this is it being made official.”
In previous years, writers
and publishers have grumbled that the prize often goes to obscure writers with
clear political messages over more popular figures. But in choosing someone so
well known, and so far outside of established literary traditions, the academy
seems to have swung far into the other direction, bestowing prestige on a
popular artist who already had plenty of it.
It’s not the first time it
has stretched the definition of literature. In 1953, Winston Churchill received
the prize, in part as recognition of the literary qualities of his soaring
political speeches and “brilliant oratory in defending exalted human values,”
according to the academy. And many were surprised last year, when the prize
went to the Belarussian journalist Svetlana Alexievich, whose deeply reported
narratives draw on oral history.
In its citation, the
Swedish Academy credited Mr. Dylan with “having created new poetic expressions
within the great American song tradition.”
Sara Danius, a literary
scholar and the permanent secretary of the 18-member academy, which called Mr.
Dylan “a great poet in the English-speaking tradition” and compared him to
Homer and Sappho, whose work was delivered orally. Asked if the decision to
award the prize to a musician signaled a broadening in the definition of
literature, Ms. Danius responded, “The times they are a-changing, perhaps.”
Mr. Dylan, whose original
name is Robert Allen Zimmerman, was born on May 24, 1941, in Duluth, Minn. He
emerged on the New York music scene in 1961 as an artist in the tradition of
Woody Guthrie, singing protest songs and strumming an acoustic guitar in clubs
and cafes in Greenwich Village.
But from the start, Mr.
Dylan stood out for dazzling lyrics and an oblique songwriting style that made
him a source of fascination for artists and critics. In 1963, the folk group
Peter, Paul and Mary reached No. 2 on the Billboard pop chart with a version of
“Blowin’ in the Wind,” whose ambiguous refrains evoked Ecclesiastes.
Within a few years, Mr.
Dylan was confounding the very notion of folk music, with ever more complex
songs and moves toward a more rock ’n’ roll sound. In 1965, he played with an
electric rock band at the Newport Folk Festival, provoking a backlash from fans
who accused him of selling out.
After reports of a
motorcycle accident in 1966 near his home in Woodstock, N.Y., Mr. Dylan
withdrew further from public life but remained intensely fertile as a
songwriter. His voluminous archives, showing his working process through
thousands of pages of songwriting drafts, were acquired this year by
institutions in Tulsa, Okla.
His 1975 album “Blood on
the Tracks” was interpreted as a supremely powerful account of the breakdown of
a relationship, but just four years later the Christian themes of “Slow Train
Coming” divided critics. His most recent two albums were chestnuts of
traditional pop that had been associated with Frank Sinatra.
Since 1988, Mr. Dylan has
toured almost constantly, inspiring an unofficial name for his itinerary, the
Never Ending Tour. Last weekend, he played the first of two performances at
Desert Trip, a festival in Indio, Calif., that also featured the Rolling Stones,
Paul McCartney and other stars of the 1960s. He is scheduled to return on
Friday for the festival’s second weekend.
Nobel Prize Winning
Scientists Reflect on Nearly Sleeping Through the Life-Changing Call
How eight winners got the
word.
“As the ’60s wore on,”
Giles Harvey wrote in The New York Review of Books in 2010, “Dylan grew
increasingly frustrated with what he came to regard as the pious sloganeering
and doctrinaire leftist politics of the folk milieu.” He “began writing a kind
of visionary nonsense verse, in which the rough, ribald, lawless America of the
country’s traditional folk music collided with a surreal ensemble of characters
from history, literature, legend, the Bible, and many other places besides.”
Mr. Dylan’s many albums,
which the Swedish Academy described as having “a tremendous impact on popular
music,” include “Bringing It All Back Home” and “Highway 61 Revisited” (1965),
“Blonde on Blonde” (1966), “Blood on the Tracks” (1975), “Oh Mercy” (1989),
“Time Out Of Mind” (1997), “‘Love and Theft’” (2001) and “Modern Times” (2006).
His 38 studio albums have sold 125 million copies around the world.
The academy added: “Dylan
has the status of an icon. His influence on contemporary music is profound, and
he is the object of a steady stream of secondary literature.”
Mr. Dylan’s many honors
include Grammy, Academy and Golden Globe awards. He was inducted into the Rock
and Roll Hall of Fame in 1988, won a special Pulitzer Prize in 2008 and was
awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom in 2012.
The Nobel comes with a
prize of 8 million Swedish kronor, or just over $900,000. The literature prize
is given for a lifetime of writing rather than for a single work.
Sign Up for the Louder
Newsletter
Every week, stay on top of
the latest in pop and jazz with reviews, interviews, podcasts and more from The
New York Times music critics. Coming soon.
SEE SAMPLE PRIVACY POLICY
“Today, everybody from
Bruce Springsteen to U2 owes Bob a debt of gratitude,” President Obama said at
the medal ceremony. “There is not a bigger giant in the history of American
music. All these years later, he’s still chasing that sound, still searching
for a little bit of truth. And I have to say that I am a really big fan.”
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/14/arts/music/bob-dylan-nobel-prize-literature.html?ribbon-ad-idx=6&rref=arts/music&module=Ribbon&version=context®ion=Header&action=click&contentCollection=Music&pgtype=article
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario