Life in Palmyra did not stop in the third century but has gone on more or less continuously at the site for the 1,700 years since.
Louis Vignes, “Temple of Bel” (1864), albumen print (the Getty
Research Institute, 2015)
If news outlets thrust the ancient Syrian city of Palmyra (known as
Tadmur in Arabic) into the public eye in 2015, when it was captured by ISIS,
then museums have helped keep it there ever since. Most recently, the Getty
Research Institute launched the online exhibition Return to Palmyra.
Promotional material says the exhibition “re-presents” the Getty’s first online
exhibition, The Legacy of Ancient Palmyra, from 2017. As with that earlier
exhibition, Return to Palmyra centers on two rich sets of material illustrating
Palmyra that the Getty owns: 18th-century etchings made after drawings by Louis-François
Cassas (acquired in 1984); and 19th-century photographs by Louis Vignes
(acquired in that fateful year of 2015). All of these, of course, are put in context of
the recent devastation of the site during the Syrian Civil War.
One drawback of the original format of the
exhibition was that it almost completely ignored life in post-classical
Palmyra, which did not stop in the third century but has gone on more or less
continuously at the site for the 1,700 years since. This absence was striking,
since the Getty’s collections provide a wealth of detail about the
Ottoman-period village at Palmyra, including the only known plan of the
village’s mosque, in the cella of the Temple of Bel. The Getty’s prior focus on
Roman-era Palmyra was so extreme that at least one reviewer concluded that the
city was long deserted by the 19th century, merely hosting Bedouin squatters.
So, how does the re-presentation compare? At
first, it appears mostly the same. The “exhibition” portion of the site is a
verbatim copy of the earlier exhibition, with the added feature of an Arabic
translation of the original text. The rich recent history of Palmyra and its
people is still ignored.
Now, however, there is an added essay by curator Joan Aruz,
entitled “Palmyra: Caravan City and Cultural Crossroads.” The focus is on the
classical city, but Aruz also looks briefly at the rest of its history.
Unusually, Aruz mentions that there was a village centered on the Temple of Bel
compound into the 1930s and that the French (who controlled Syria under a
League of Nations mandate) forcibly relocated the inhabitants at that time to a
new town adjacent to the ancient ruins, in the name of excavation and
preservation.
That recent history of the site is also pointedly referred to in a featured interview, conducted with Waleed Khaled al-As’ad, son of the archaeologist Khaled al-As’ad (murdered by ISIS in 2015 — because of his ties to the government and the Ba’ath party, not, as was rumored, because he refused to reveal the location of treasures for ISIS to destroy or loot). Al-As’ad’s family is from Palmyra — he can trace them back six generations in the town — and he himself grew up there. “To be the child of such a place, and to have lived alongside these great monuments,” al-As’ad reflects, “… is always a point of happiness and pride.” The interview also touches on the fate of the contemporary town: four years after Syrian and Russian forces pushed ISIS out, the city still lies in rubble; al-As’ad suggests only 1,000 to 1,500 inhabitants are left, of the tens of thousands who lived there before the war.
The exhibition, and the images it contains, are visually
impressive. But this visual impressiveness of Palmyra’s ancient past has also
served propaganda purposes for all sides in the Syrian Civil War: ISIS, the
Syrian government and Russia (as restorers of cultural heritage), and the US
and UK (fighting for “civilization” against “barbarism”). The modern city, not
as photogenic, is usually ignored. In re-presenting the exhibition, the Getty
has taken some small steps to address Palmyra’s rich history over the last
1,700 years, not just its Roman-era past. But it still has a long way to go.
https://hyperallergic.com/623729/the-getty-return-to-palmyra/?utm_campaign=daily&utm_content=20210223&utm_medium=email&utm_source=newsletter
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario