From left,
two evening dresses created decades apart — 1968 and circa 1935 — by the French
designer Madame Grès (a.k.a. Alix Barton), alongside a 2010 ensemble by Iris
van Herpen.CreditJake Naughton for The New York Times
Sometimes
fashion is art, sometimes it is just stuff to wear. Other times it is
mind-boggling craft and exquisite technique whose aesthetic strangeness can
render the art question moot.
That’s the
effect of “Manus x Machina: Fashion in an Age of Technology,” the latest of the
Metropolitan Museum of Art’s annual fashion extravaganzas from its Costume
Institute, and one distinguished by a lack of Met Gala-style hoopla. It
celebrates the luxury wares of mostly French fashion houses, but brings fresh
focus to the convergence of traditional haute couture and high-end
ready-to-wear. A new closeness has emerged, partly through a shared reliance on
intricate tech-savvy processes. The exhibition is sponsored by Apple — perhaps
an improvement over the often-too-cozy patronage of fashion houses — and comes
at a time when a few tech companies are edging into fashion with their own
athleisure lines.
The show is
unusually thoughtful — a stately, gorgeous tutorial. Encompassing 170 ensembles
and dresses, it examines how haute couture, long associated with impeccably
handmade garments tailored to individual clients, is increasingly integrating
breakthroughs in technologies and materials. Technology (machina) is not
replacing the hand (manus); rather, the two are collaborating as never before,
stimulating innovation and expression.
This is
evidenced by an assortment of dresses, several of them by the imaginative Dutch
designer Iris van Herpen, that border on sculpture in their form and lack of
function. The often complex joinings of forces are spelled out in labels where
various kinds of handwork mingle with references to 3-D printing, laser this
and laser that, ultrasonic welding and custom software-rendered patterns.
As these
extravaganzas go, “Manus x Machina” is exceptional, its clarity and serenity
distinguishing it from quite a few of its predecessors at the Costume
Institute. It was organized by Andrew Bolton,
who became its head curator in January, with the retirement of the widely
respected Harold Koda.
Mr. Bolton
has always aimed high, often guided by a flair for showmanship. He has risked
failure and, at times, been its victim. He was responsible for the finely honed
spectacle of the Alexander McQueen retrospective in 2011 and the ambitious but
flawed “China: Through
the Looking Glass” last year. But he has also organized
exercises in frenetic vacuity like “AngloMania,” “Superheroes: Fashion and
Fantasy” and the overreaching “Punk: Chaos to Couture.”
With “Manus
x Machina,” Mr. Bolton is in fine form: over the top, but with a dignity and
restraint more typical of his predecessor, especially in Mr. Koda’s last major
exhibition, an examination of Charles James’s wonderfully architectural
garments.
Mr. Bolton’s
show is structured according to six of the métiers — or trades — of dressmaking
that are as essential to couture today as they were in the mid-18th-century,
when Diderot’s encyclopedia formalized their tools and processes. (The
pertinent volumes are on view.)
The métiers
here progress from embroidery and featherwork, through artificial flowers,
pleating, lace and leatherwork. Métiers have usually been handled by outside
specialists famous in their own right, among them Maison Lesage (embroidery), Maison Sophie Hallette (lace) andMaison Lemarié (feather and
leatherwork).
The show
also includes a section titled “Tailleur & Flou,” or tailoring and
dressmaking, the traditional divisions within a couture house. Here you’ll also
find toiles, or muslins — prototypes used in early stages of the design
process. Included are both actual muslins and irreverent contemporary garments
inspired by them, from designers like Martin Margiela, John Galliano for Dior
and Alber Elbaz for Lanvin.
“Manus x
Machina” occupies the two-story Robert Lehman Wing — a new location in the Met
for Costume Institute shows. It is blissfully low-tech. A few short videos on
tiny screens allow glimpses at the designers or artisans at work. The show’s
only soundtrack is Brian Eno’s soothing, slightly ecclesiastical “An Ending
(Ascent),” which is almost certain to enhance concentration.
A Sarah
Burton dress for Alexander McQueen, 2012.CreditJake Naughton for The New York
Times
So will the
exhibition’s wonderfully understated gallery treatments conceived by Shohei
Shigematsu, who leads the New York office of Rem Koolhaas’s Office for
Metropolitan Architecture, in collaboration with the Met’s design department.
The clothes
are set against white cotton backdrops that sharpen their colors. In addition
to lining the walls, this muslinlike fabric is used for scrims that form arched
niches and domes, transforming the space into a glowing, abstract cathedral.
A false
floor has also been built across the Lehman’s atrium, creating a central
gallery, an interesting precedent that other museums saddled with uninspiring
spaces might study.
The train of
“Wedding Ensemble,” by Karl Lagerfeld, for House of Chanel.CreditJake Naughton
for The New York Times
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/06/arts/design/review-at-the-costume-institute-couture-meets-technology.html?_r=0
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario