An example of the first
patented model of the Maelzel Metronome, made in Paris around 1816. Credit Tony
Bingham/Basel Historical Museum
BASEL, Switzerland — When
you enter the Museum of Music here, you are first met with a sequence of tests.
A finger clip takes your pulse. A treadmill measures your pace. Next up is a
snare drum station, where you don headphones and tap in time to a regular beat,
then try to maintain it after the auditory cues fell silent. An electronic
display notes rhythmic accuracy in percentages.
This music critic scored a
humiliating 47 percent.
“That’s not very good, by
the way,” Martin Kirnbauer, a musicologist said gently, and somewhat
redundantly. He is the curator of the exhibition “Up Beat! Metronomes and
Musical Time” here, which investigates how timekeeping devices have affected
the way composers and performers relate to time. Isabel Münzner, the museum’s
director, cut in diplomatically: “We get drum majors here from the Basel
Carnival bands, and they are shocked when they only score in the 70 percent
range.”
The snare drum challenge is
the only aspect of this fascinating and occasionally lighthearted show that
feels mildly punitive — though the massive walls of this fortified building
complex towering over Basel’s historic center, and the tiny cells that house
some of the display cases, are constant reminders that this was once a prison
where men did time.
The interactive features at
the start of the show also introduce a predicament that is central to the
relationship of music and meter: that once inventors solved the problem of how
to measure and codify musical time, musicians could be measured against an
external standard.
But in order to breathe,
music relies on a certain amount of flexibility, on the skill of a performer to
toy with the tempo in ways that molds a phrase or throws into relief the
emotional trajectory of a piece. The question of how to balance precision and
freedom, accuracy and interpretation has always vexed musicians. With the
invention of the metronome it became more acute. An underlying theme of the
exhibition, Ms. Münzner said, is “how much of your inner life you bring into
music.”
The earliest guides to
pacing a piece of music were internal, personal and subject to fluctuations —
chief among them the human pulse. By the 18th century a common tempo marking
was “Andante,” Italian for “walking.” Others, like “Tempo di Minuetto,”
referred to particular social dances. But even more often pieces of music were
merely marked as “slow,” “quick” or “grave.”
For some composers and
theorists this was frustratingly vague, and beginning in the 17th century came
attempts to link musical time to the motion of a clock. Around the same time
scientists discovered that the length of a pendulum affects the speed of its motion,
with a pendulum of just under one meter swinging at one second each way.
Instrument makers seized on this to build musical timekeeping devices in which
the length of a pendulum is adjusted according to specific gradations to make
it swing at a desired speed.
One example on show is the
English “Balance Regulator” by Rudolph Ackermann from 1812. It’s one of the
earliest pieces in the comprehensive collection of metronomes by the British
instrument dealer Tony Bingham, which forms the bulk of the Basel exhibition.
(The show has been extended through January 2018.) Pendulum-based timekeepers
were silent — offering only visual guidance — and relied on distance units,
which varied from country to country. To a musician in Italy, the markings in
inches on Ackermann’s “Regulator” would have been of little use. And to mark
slower speeds, a pendulum had to be lengthened to unwieldy proportions — over
two meters for 40 swings per minute.
In 1814 a watchmaker in
Amsterdam, Nikolaus Winkel, came up with a breakthrough. His “musical
cronometer” still featured a pendulum, but its point of suspension was now
moved to the middle of a rod, with a weight at either end. By moving one of the
weights along the rod, closer or farther away from the fulcrum, the oscillation
speed could be precisely controlled. Even very slow speeds could now be
achieved on a portable device.
Winkel sent his invention
to the Dutch Institute of Sciences in 1815 for assessment. But in the meantime
he had made the acquaintance of Johann Nepomuk Maelzel, a pianist and builder
of mechanical music machines from Vienna, who had been developing a
pendulum-based timekeeping device of his own.
Beethoven was one of the
first composers who used the Maelzel Metronome to specify tempo indications in
his composition. Credit Three Lions/Getty Images
According to David Fallows,
who wrote the introduction to the exhibition catalog, Maelzel “immediately
recognized the technical and practical advantages of Winkel’s instrument and
offered to buy the design.” Even though Winkel refused, Maelzel soon after
filed for, and was granted, a patent in Paris for what he called a “metronome”
— combining the Greek words for measure and rule — adapted from Winkel’s
design.
A British patent followed.
By the end of 1817, the instrument was in use across Europe and composers
including Beethoven were marking the speeds of their compositions with an MM number
indicating the number of beats per minute as produced on a “Maelzel Metronome.”
In a phone interview Mr.
Bingham shed doubt on a famous anecdote according to which Maelzel sent 200
metronomes for free to as many composers. “That’s a complete fabrication,” he
said. “There’s no contemporary account of it at the time, and it would have
been a big thing. If you look at Maelzel as an entrepreneur, he had a very
up-and-down life. He couldn’t have afforded to fabricate 200 instruments and
give them away.”
Still, Maelzel’s marketing
skills — he also placed anonymous endorsements of his own product in newspapers
and pressured composers to add theirs — ensured that his metronome became an
integral part of musical culture. Even so, Mr. Kirnbauer, the curator, said
silent pendulum-based timekeepers continued in use well into the 20th century.
Bartok used one during his field research into Hungarian folk music.
Non-musicians also adopted
the ticktocking metronome. Mr. Bingham’s collection includes an enormous
pyramid-shaped “army preceptor” built in London around 1840 that was used in
military drills. It has three speeds: slow, quick and double-quick. Medical
researchers adapted metronomes for experiments on the nervous system, for use
in therapy with Parkinson’s patients and stutterers. Dubious products in the
late 20th century included a “New Relax Machine” to be placed on the solar
plexus, and a device for self-hypnosis. Pavlov’s famous dog learned to salivate
to the ticking of a metronome.
By then musicians had
developed a testy relationship with the device. That was because the metronome
quickly outgrew its original intended use. At first, the purpose was to allow a
composer to clearly indicate the tempo at which a work was to be played. The
performer would listen to a few ticktocks to note the desired speed and then
turn off the device to play or sing.
But soon pedagogues seized
on the metronome’s potential to act as taskmaster and conductor in the absence
of a teacher, advising students to practice scales and entire movements to the
audible mechanized beat. This was contrary to the natural flexibility of tempo
that had been self-evident in musical performance for centuries, the little
eddies of halting or rushing motion that lend life and flow to music.
Brahms, who rarely wrote
down metronome markings in his autographs, said he did so only when “good friends
have talked me into putting them there, for I myself have never believed that
my blood and a mechanical instrument go well together.”
Sebastian Currier, who was
the composer-in-residence at the recent Chelsea Music Festival in New York,
which also had as its theme “Measuring Time,” said in an interview that “there
has to be one unwritten strata” in any composition. Still, he said he was
content with the convenience of using metronome markings to set the initial
conditions of a piece: “The flexibility you have to gain from the music.”
The violinist Filip Pogady
and the pianist Robert Fleitz performing Sebastian Currier’s “Clockwork” at the
recent Chelsea Music Festival, whose theme was “Measuring Time.” Credit Ryan
Muir for Chelsea Music Festival
In the 20th century,
technology made it ever easier to regulate the production of sound, with
electronic music allowing for perfectly even pacings. Click tracks became
common in performances, especially of Minimalist music, with musicians fitted
with an earpiece that delivered a steady beat.
On the other end of the
spectrum were composers like John Cage, many of whose compositions transcend
the need for a metronome: His famous, silent “4’33” requires no subdivision
into beats.
The Basel exhibition explores
some of the more rebellious responses to the metronome in a room that features
the instructions for Ligeti’s “Poème Symphonique” for 100 metronomes, a work
that scandalized a Dutch audience in 1962 because the timekeeping devices were
the sole instruments. There’s also a video of the orgiastic scene in Fellini’s
“La Prova d’Orchestra” (“Orchestra Rehearsal”) from 1978 in which the irate
musicians attack a tomb-size metronome.
Today, computers have
learned to simulate the tiny irregularities that the human ear is drawn to in
music. Recording engineers put computer-generated music through a process of
“humanizing” that delays the beat by a few milliseconds. In that sense a quote
by the 18th-century composer and flutist Johann Joachim Quantz seems prophetic:
“With skill a musical
machine could be constructed that would play certain pieces with a quickness
and exactitude so remarkable that no human being could equal it either with his
fingers or with his tongue,” he wrote. “Indeed it would excite astonishment;
but it would never move you.”
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/30/arts/music/ticktock-as-taskmaster-a-show-about-metronomes-and-musical-time.html
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario