Palazzo Ducale considers
itself a victim, while the curator denies any involvement. If the expert’s
report is confirmed in court proceedings, the works, previously valued at
millions of euros, will be destroyed
di Erika Dellacasa
GENOA – Those concerned now
are the collectors, the owners of the 21 Modigliani paintings put on show last
July at the Palazzo Ducale, which according to the expert appointed by Genoa’s
state prosecutor’s office are all fakes. If this assessment is confirmed in
court, Italian law requires the destruction of the offending works, only a few
months ago valued at millions of euros. This was also the solution called for
by art expert and Modigliani scholar Marc Restellini, writing in Le Monde two
weeks ago. Together with Tuscan art critic Carlo Pepi, he was one of the first
to brand the works on display in Genoa as “forgery on a huge scale”.
“Forgery on a huge scale”
“I gave the Carabinieri all
the information in my possession,” Restellini said, “to explain how this
forgery system works. There is no doubt that the works are fakes; I said so and
provided the evidence”. His comments were echoed by a triumphant Pepi: “Finally
the bubble has burst. I have been fighting against the forgery of Modiglianis
for years, and have been opposed and even persecuted by the art establishment.
Modigliani seemed to have painted more pictures after death than when he was
alive; it was an absurd situation. But this is just the tip of the iceberg”.
Expert’s report
Following a formal
complaint lodged by Pepi, in July Genoa’s state prosecutor’s office ordered the
seizure of 21 suspect Modigliani works, leading to a huge scandal. Isabella
Quattrocchi has now stated in her report that all the paintings are “crudely
forged” – in terms of both “style and pigments”. The report also points out
that the frames are “from countries in Eastern Europe and the United States,
and cannot be linked to Modigliani’s context or historical period”. In the
absence of further explanation, this comment has left art experts perplexed,
since the frames should be irrelevant when establishing the authenticity of the
works, considering that most of the paintings belong to an American collector,
Joseph Guttmann. It is thus no surprise that they were produced in the USA.
Battle looming
In short, while some are
exultant over this “unmasking”, and others, such as Palazzo Ducale, see
themselves as “victims, the real injured party”, others, such as exhibition
curator Rudy Chiappini defend their work. The Modigliani case looks far from
being solved. In fact, although the state-appointed expert has branded the
seized works as worthless daubs, the owners are unlikely to sit back and watch
their investment go up in smoke, and are bound to respond with expert
assessments of their own. Meanwhile, it should be noted that one of the
paintings from the Pasquinelli collection even boasts an Italian ministerial
certificate of authenticity. The curator Chiappini stressed that he was not
responsible for attributing the works to Modigliani: “I collected the
information and documentation that was submitted to me for each canvas. If
there has been any wrongdoing, we will need to go back to the original source
of those attributions. Until proven otherwise, I remain convinced that the works
are originals. And that story of the frames is ridiculous”.
http://www.corriere.it/english/18_gennaio_10/modigliani-paintings-genoa-exhibition-crude-fakes-b1264e62-f61a-11e7-9b06-fe054c3be5b2.shtml
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario