This week, Shigeru Ban’s
Mt. Fuji Center, Basquiat in London, the Met’s new admission policy, reviewing
Trump’s border wall prototypes, the Library of Congress’s Twitter archive, and
more.
Hrag Vartanian
The Shigeru Ban-designed
Mt. Fuji World Heritage Center opened in Japan a few weeks ago. It is as
stunning as one would expect. See more images on Design Boom. (via Design Boom)
Saul Nelson reviews the
Basquiat show at the Barbican in London:
This brings us back to the
heroes of black masculinity, to Joe Louis knocking out Max Schmeling in the
first round and Parker inventing bebop on the eve of the Second World War.
These are Basquiat’s icons, but as bell hooks has pointed out, he cannot
represent them as straightforwardly strong and heroic because they have to be
mediated through the horrors of the present. Sugar Ray Robinson (1982) and Jack
Johnson (1982) and the figures in King Zulu are half-formed, mutilated,
scratched out to become negatives. Basquiat typically composed his figures from
pure black pigment and added contours and features in white. For him, the black
body comes to seem like more of a ground than the ground of the painting
itself. The recursive, scribbled lines make the body into a sort of blackboard
which the artist has doodled all over, like graffitists on the city streets.
Twombly was famous for his blackboards covered in indecipherable white script –
one sold for $70 million a few years ago, almost as much as Basquiat’s
paintings now go for – but it was Basquiat who saw that the surface textures of
our environment are never impersonal, even in a gallery, that people are
written over too. His heroes are endlessly, illegibly inscribed.
Holland Cotter and Roberta
Smith discuss the Metropolitan Museum’s new admissions policy, which will force
out-of-towners to pay full price:
COTTER That economic ruling
class, for its part, could, and should, contribute to an open-door cultural
policy. I think of a very small example of the possibilities: Thanks to
earmarked donations by a single patron (the Rubins, of the Rubin Museum of Art
in Chelsea) the Bronx Museum of the Arts was able to begin a free admission
program for several years that the museum continues today.
Which leads me to wonder
about the civic good will behind — and institutional wisdom in accepting —
another example of donor earmarking: the $65 million patron-inscribed fountains
recently installed (and critically panned) at the Met. If the museum’s figures
are accurate, and the new mandatory policy for out of state visitors will bring
in $6 million to $11 million a year in admissions revenue; the money spent on
the fountains would have covered that income for a decade.
The Library of Congress
used to archive every tweet. Now the Library of Congress stopped doing that
starting December 31, 2017. Why? Because tweets are increasingly crappy. It’s
white paper on the topic explains:
After this time, the
Library will continue to acquire tweets but will do so on a very selective
basis under the overall guidance provided in the Library’s Collections Policy
Statements and associated documents (loc.gov/acq/devpol/). Generally, the
tweets collected and archived will be thematic and event-based, including
events such as elections, or themes of ongoing national interest, e.g. public
policy.
LA Times architecture
critic Christopher Hawthorne reviews Trump’s border wall prototypes:
What the prototypes didn’t
resemble, in any practical sense, was a wall. (A swatch of fabric is not a
shirt; a lone panel from an umbrella won’t keep you dry when it rains.) It
wasn’t just that they suggested Potemkin slices, architectural stand-ins to
match the human ones Trump’s campaign invited to the news conference kicking
off his White House bid.
Because they’d been put up
with gaps between them — the better to appreciate the differences from one
design to the next — they offered no sense of enclosure or completeness. This
gave the whole display a surprising and ironic twist: the way the prototypes
were arranged struck me as emblematic of the limits of Trump’s border-security
aspirations. They were prototypes of a wall that will likely, for practical
reasons as well as political ones, always be as notable for its gaps as for its
consistent protection.
Every Second is a site that
keeps track of various things that happen around the world by the second, and
some of these visualizations are quite impressive, including:
Animal heartbeats
How much celebrity
musicians get paid
What McDonald’s sells every
second
Stanford scholar Carol
Shloss’ gets six-figure settlement from James Joyce Estate:
Stephen Joyce has stopped
countless public readings of his grandfather’s works and discouraged a
generation of research. At one point, he told a prominent Joyce scholar that he
was no longer giving permission to quote from any of Joyce’s work. He told one
performer, who had simply memorized a portion of Finnegans Wake for an onstage
presentation, that he had probably “already infringed” on the estate’s
copyright, according to a 2006 New Yorker story. (The performer later
discovered that Joyce did not have the right to block his performance.) Shloss
herself recalls a conference where a scholar had Joyce’s words projected on a
screen rather than risk pronouncing the words in a recorded session.
“It’s a breakthrough, not
just for me but for everybody who has to deal with a literary estate,” said
Shloss. “This has been going on for decades. Scholars are not wealthy people.
We don’t have easy access to the legal system to determine and vindicate our
rights if someone threatens us with a lawsuit. You just have to give in.
https://hyperallergic.com/420388/required-reading-354/?utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Weekend%207%20Jan%202018&utm_content=Weekend%207%20Jan%202018+CID_e01f0d5f228cedcf23aacbb8fff7b75d&utm_source=HyperallergicNewsletter&utm_term=Required%20Reading
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario