Both Mendelssohns
were composers, yet it is Felix not Fanny who is remembered. Why have so many
female artists remained unheard?
Independent Opera’s
2007 production of Maconchy’s The Sofa at Sadler’s Wells. Photograph: Belinda
Lawley
In the 1980s a
retired urban planner of Johannesburg named Aaron Cohen, with no musicological
training but with a great love of music, began publishing his Encyclopedia of
Women Composers. In two volumes, it contained around 5,000 entries. Even
allowing for the fact that many of these women’s scores were lost, the
concert-goer of today would be forgiven for expressing surprise at the sheer
number here, for it is certainly not reflected in programmes. You could,
without too much difficulty, pass through an entire concert-going life without
hearing a single note written by a woman. This is despite recuperative efforts
by individual musicians (for example, Oliver Knussen’s recordings of the remarkable
American modernist Ruth Crawford Seeger), and a flourishing of feminist
musicology from the late 1980s. The institutions of classical music tend to be
heavily invested in a carefully protected performance tradition that hands on
the precious flame of white, male genius from generation to generation and has
little interest, for all kinds of reasons, in disrupting the canon. The weight
of this history still bears down in the contemporary postmodern world, in which
figures such as Judith Weir, Tansy Davies, Anna Meredith, Emily Hall and Cheryl
Frances-Hoad (to name only Britons) have successful and fruitful careers.
Female compositional talent is still “othered”, to a degree that male
colleagues are sometimes blind to, and indeed that women themselves might prefer
not to countenance – not unreasonably finding climbing the mountain more
productive than pausing to contemplate the drop.
Sounds and Sweet
Airs, by cultural historian Anna Beer, is a timely bulwark against forgetting,
and proffers a number of reasons for the fading of female artists’ reputations.
Her subjects are eight European composers who form a kind of chain through four
centuries, beginning with the early-modern Tuscan, Francesca Caccini, whose
1625 opera La Liberazione di Ruggiero was performed at the Brighton early music
festival last year; and ending with Elizabeth Maconchy, an English composer of
Irish heritage, who died in 1994. To make work, these artists, like their male
counterparts, required aptitude, a supportive family, an excellent musical
education, and either a sufficient income from their work or other means by
which to keep going. They encountered obstacles, on the other hand, that their
male composers didn’t, whether the vagaries of childbearing (Clara Schumann
ploughed on as a composer, and especially a performer, through eight
pregnancies) or straightforward full-on sexism (Maconchy was told in the 1930s
by publisher Leonard Boosey that “he couldn’t take anything except little songs
from a woman”). More subtly, but no less powerfully, female composers have had
to negotiate notions of what has constituted a “suitable” activity for a woman.
This is not a story
of direct progress: in some ways, Beer’s early-modern women seem to have
enjoyed greater freedom than their sisters in later centuries. Caccini was the
daughter of a family that made its living in the music trade; a woman with a
fabulous voice in an era when the membrane between composer and performer was
thin. She found herself in the right place at the right time in the Tuscan
court of the 1620s, when Cosimo II de’ Medici’s early death left two women as
regents for the young Ferdinando – Christina of Lorraine and her
daughter-in-law, Maria Magdalena. Caccini produced scores for court occasions
at a frenetic rate (most of which are lost) and even whistle-blew the chief
court poet, Andrea Salvadori, who was neither the first nor the last man to use
the couch as an aid to casting for the stage. A contemporary wrote that
Caccini, “a woman as fierce and restless as she was capable in singing and
acting, could not abide this behaviour, and began to expose and talk about
him”. His response was to write a poem called “Donne Musiche Parlano
dell’Inferno” (Women Musicians Speak from Hell). Beer writes too of Barbara
Strozzi, who came of age as a composer in the 1650s in Venice, and produced
alluringly beautiful and clever songs that subtly undermined their sexist
lyrics. Fast-forward to Fanny Mendelssohn, Felix’s sister. Both were brought up
in the same hothouse musical environment, both composed like crazy, but it was
Felix not Fanny who is remembered; propriety, her class and the age meant that
her musical ambitions were mostly pursued in private. Her painter husband
Wilhelm Hensel encouraged her to publish her music, but Felix most certainly
did not, writing that “it runs counter to my views and convictions … Fanny …
has neither enthusiasm nor calling for authorship; then too, she is too much a
Frau, as is proper, raises Sebastian and cares for her home … ” (She did in
fact have the appetite for authorship and she did, eventually, publish.) After
her death her work was subject to insidiously gendered critiques: it was said
to lack “a commanding individual idea” and the “feeling which originates in the
depth of the soul”.
A production of
Francesca Caccini’s La Liberazione di Ruggiero as part of the Brighton early
music festival, 2015. Photograph: Robert Piwko/BREMF
Schumann, the virtuosa
pianist, subsumed her writing into her husband’s career, and internalised male
anxieties about female composers, becoming her own fiercest critic. Maconchy
did what young women often do today: self-organised, so that she was not wholly
reliant on existing institutions. Together with like-minded colleagues
including composer Elisabeth Lutyens, violinist Anne Macnaghten and conductor
Iris Lemare, she put on concerts in the Ballet Club theatre in Notting Hill,
London, in the 1930s. Male critical responses to her work register a sometimes
aggrieved sense of having been gender-wrongfooted: one referred to her music’s
“almost aggressive virility” as if it were an affront. Even now, she is
described as “furrow-browed” and “sombre” – descriptions that certainly do not
fit her farcical one-act opera, The Sofa, which was revived in London in 2007.
Maconchy cared for her children by day, and composed at the piano at night,
fiercely compartmentalising her life. Her colleague Macnaghten described an
artist who was “like a tiger inside … between nursery rhymes and washing
nappies”
Maconchy’s career,
in Beer’s entertaining account, comes closest to what a successful composer’s
life in modern Britain might consist of, with its conservatoire education, Proms
commissions and eventual damehood – though no one could claim that her music
was overperformed today. She was the first woman president of the Society for
the Promotion of New Music. The successor to that organisation, Sound and
Music, which supports composers in Britain, has a strong commitment to gender
equality. It is also keen to increase opportunities for black and minority
ethnic composers, who are woefully invisible in the UK’s classical musical
culture. Some balk at the notion that such “extra-musical” factors might be
invoked when programming a concert – as if commercial concerns, personal
relationships and a host of unremarked prejudices did not come into play in any
act of curatorship. This book helps show why a narrative that insists that the
good stuff will naturally and always rise to the surface is simplistic. It is
important for us all, composers, musicians, audiences, men, women, society at
large, that we seek out the best and most exciting creative voices, from
wherever they may come.
https://www.theguardian.com/books/2016/apr/26/sounds-and-sweet-airs-the-forgotten-women-of-classical-music-anna-beer-review
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario