Surveying the reporting on
Syrian antiquities over the last six years reveals a parade of errors, but it
is noteworthy that most, if not all, of the errors cut in the same way: to
inflate the threat ISIS poses to cultural heritage while ignoring the threat
posed by other armed groups.
Michael Press
Krak des Chavaliers under
fire (image courtesy Wikimedia Commons)
BLOOMINGTON, Ind. — It is a
cool day in early spring of March 2016. Several men, some of them wearing
masks, are dismantling what appears to be a medieval building in Al Rafid, a
village near Quneitra in southwestern Syria. Boys are helping too, or at least
playing in the rubble. We might be tempted to think we are watching ISIS members
destroying a piece of cultural heritage. But no — according to the SMART news
agency, this is actually a video of local villagers looking for material to
rebuild their homes.
By now, the war in Syria
has raged for more than six years. We have seen death on a massive scale and a
heartbreaking refugee crisis, as well as serious threats to monuments and
artifacts. Since early 2014, ISIS has been presented in news reports as the
greatest threat not just to human life but also to cultural heritage in Syria.
But cases like Al Rafid point to something else: the reality that looting of
and damage to antiquities take many forms. And when we compare that reality to
its portrayal in media outlets over the course of the war, we find that most
reporting has ignored — or hidden — several basic facts.
ISIS is not responsible for
the majority of antiquities looting in Syria.
By early 2013, experts were
already pointing out that Assad’s forces, rebels, and jihadist groups were all
involved in antiquities looting, before ISIS was in control of much territory.
A study of satellite images of six select sites by the American Association for
the Advancement of Science (AAAS), published in December 2014, showed
significant looting by ISIS by this time, but also significant looting in areas
controlled by other groups (though this was not emphasized by the press release
or subsequent news reports). The most detailed study was published by the
Cultural Heritage Initiatives (formerly the Syrian Heritage Initiative) of the
American Schools of Oriental Research (ASOR CHI) in September 2015, when ISIS
was close to its largest extent in Syria. The study determined that areas held
by ISIS, Syrian government forces, Kurdish YPG, and other rebel groups all
experienced significant looting of antiquities. More surprisingly, the study
concluded that only 21.4% of the sites evaluated in ISIS-controlled territory
had been looted, which was lower than percentages for YPG and Syrian opposition
groups.
Overwhelmingly, however,
news stories have focused (and continue to focus) on ISIS looting. We read
several features on ISIS looters and trafficking. But no one to my knowledge
has published “The Men Who Loot for Al Qaeda” (or Assad, or the Free Syrian
Army). Headlines highlight ISIS even when stories include general warnings
about looting and destruction in the Syrian Civil War: for example, “‘Broken
System’ Allows ISIS to Profit From Looted Antiquities” (New York Times, Jan 9,
2016). Business Insider then took a warning about looting and destruction in
general from this article (“We’re faced with the largest-scale mass destruction
of cultural heritage since the Second World War”) and turned it, out of
context, into a headline warning about ISIS: “ISIS’ looting of the Middle East
is ‘the largest-scale mass destruction of cultural heritage since’ WWII”
(January 12, 2016). ISIS is said to have dug up objects that appeared on the
antiquities market before ISIS existed. Several stories link destructive
looting at the major classical period site of Apamea to ISIS. ISIS has never
been present at Apamea. At Palmyra, it is clear that Assad’s forces, rebel
groups, and ISIS have all looted antiquities, but non-ISIS actions have been
mostly ignored. Stories attempt to associate pre-ISIS looting at Palmyra with
ISIS…………………
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario