BEHIND THE FIG LEAF—A STORY
OF SIN, CENSORSHIP, AND THE CATHOLIC
CHURCH
By Alexxa Gotthardt
Charles Meynier, Statue of
Mercury in a Landscape. Musée de la Révolution française. Photo via Wikimedia
Commons.
Consider the fig leaf: a
little piece of foliage that’s shielded the genitals of famous biblical figures
and nude sculptures for centuries. It’s a plant that’s become synonymous with
sin, sex, and censorship. And in large part, we have art history—and the
artists determined to portray nudity even when it was considered taboo—to thank
for that.
Take Michelangelo’s famous
sculpture David (1501–04), a muscular, starkly naked depiction of its namesake
biblical hero. The work scandalized the artist’s fellow Florentines and the
Catholic clergy when unveiled in Florence’s Piazza della Signoria in 1504. Soon
after, the figure’s sculpted phallus was girdled with a garland of bronze fig leaves
by authorities.
60 years later, just months
before Michelangelo’s death, the Catholic Church issued an edict demanding that
“figures shall not be painted or adorned with a beauty exciting…lust.” The
clergy began a crusade to camouflage the pensises and pubic hair visible in
artworks across Italy. Their coverups of choice? Loincloths, foliage, and—most
often—fig leaves. It has became known as the “Fig Leaf Campaign,” one of
history’s most significant acts of art censorship.
But the fig leaf’s role in
art history doesn’t begin with Michelangelo. The plant’s cultural significance
can be clearly traced back to the tale of Adam and Eve. The duo, shamed by
their nudity after eating from the tree of knowledge, “sewed fig leaves
together and made themselves aprons,” as chronicled in the Book of Genesis.
Early artistic depictions of the purported events show the once-nude figures
sheathed in leaves that obscure their genitals, subtly representing original
sin and a fall from grace.
This story—which became
integral to Christianity’s teachings—communicated to the religion’s flock that
nudity was shameful. By the medieval era, art commissioned by the Catholic
Church mostly represented nudity as a sin; it was used to depict people who’d
been sent to hell.
But that began to change in
the 1400s, when Italian artists—thanks to a mounting interest in antiquities
and excavation—rediscovered classical Roman and Greek art. Those ancient marble
sculptures were forged in a time when the chiseled nude body represented honor and
virtue, as opposed to immorality and vice.
This idea inspired artists
like Donatello, who started making work that honored the nude body in all its
glory. This was a novel idea in his hometown of Florence, where the Catholic
Church wielded vast power. His bronze rendition of David (circa 1440) has been
cited by scholars as the first known sculpture depicting a completely naked
figure since antiquity.
Some of his
artist-successors followed suit—namely, Michelangelo. Even after receiving
criticism for his own version of David (rendered at a much larger scale and
with more pronounced physical attributes than Donatello’s) in the early 1500s,
he continued to incorporate nudity into his work.
But as Michelangelo’s
artistic career developed, the Catholic Church’s crackdown on “lasciviousness”
of all kinds also intensified. This had everything to do with accusations of
corruption against the church being made by the Protestant Reformation and its
leader Martin Luther. Fearful of losing its flock, the Vatican began ordering
reforms across the church—including censorship of nudity in art.
Michelangelo Buonarroti
Creation of Adam, Sistine
Chapel ceiling, 1511-1512
Sistine Chapel, Vatican
Even so, Michelangelo
received an abundance of commissions from Popes and other powerful clergymen
during his life, most notably the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel. But sometimes,
the Vatican called him out for crossing the line of decency. In the 1540s, some
40 years after his fiasco with David, he pushed his luck yet again—this time,
for a wall fresco in the Sistine Chapel depicting the Last Judgement…………………
https://www.artsy.net/article/artsy-editorial-fig-leaf-story-sin-censorship-catholic-church?utm_medium=email&utm_source=12788286-newsletter-editorial-daily-04-06-18&utm_campaign=editorial&utm_content=st-
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario